Here’s a link to a scientist, Professor Judith Curry, proclaiming climate change is not an emergency or an immediate threat. And she gets to the essence of the difference between the ‘alarmists’ and the ‘deniers’ beginning at 18:00 and her ‘small square’ explanation at 19:35 of this 38 min video.
Her analogy is spot on. This is a political issue, not a scientific one.
I suggest that it applies to repair of other institutional errors also. Like the Article V ‘runaway’ quip fits the ‘small square’ argument by inhibiting or denying the truth. The problem is defined or attacked with a ‘small square of information’ that is shy of the broader spectrum of supporting data; the recorded facts from over 650 conventions over four centuries. Check out the latest convention of states in 2017. The records show us that there is no difference of the operation or SOP of the 1755, 1789, or 2017 conventions.
It is much like Adam Smith’s’ invisible’ hand. What is seen can not be wholly understood without understanding the broader unseen. That’s why the hand that moves the economy is invisible.
We do more harm to ourselves when we improperly state the problem; even if there isn’t a problem there in the first place. And that’s where the politics clouds the picture.
We have to fight back on too much politics that can harm we the people when we deviate from the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God and from the consent of the governed.
The progressive-left is trying their damnest to prove that climate change and conventions of states and all other Constitutional actions under federalism are irrelevant and non-political. But that is not true. Every policy expressed by the progressive-left has little to no merit because it is, it turnes out, strictly a political issue. Not really a problem after all.
Pray for guidance in returning this Nation, the Laws of Nature and Natures God back to our Creator and then to the consent of the governed, we the people!
Hunt For Liberty, Article V Taskforce, Federal Fiscal Sustainability Foundation. AMAC
