socialism

A Cure for Socialism

By Mike Kapic / March 15, 2019 / Comments Off on A Cure for Socialism

NATELSON: A FINAL CURE FOR SOCIALISM? UTAH ENDORSES CONVENTION OF STATES Robert Natelson | Senior Fellow, Independence Institute 03/11/2019 While the media fixate on the socialist impulses Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her allies, a quiet grass-roots revolution is spreading through the country. If successful, it will ensure that demagogues can never impose socialism in America. The…

Read More

Sorry Dem’s, Denmark Not Socialist

By Mike Kapic / February 12, 2019 / Comments Off on Sorry Dem’s, Denmark Not Socialist

Economists in Denmark to America: Yeah, We’re Not Socialist After reaching an economic breaking point in the 1970s, successive governments introduced a mixture of reforms—including reduced benefits, partial privatization of pensions, and lower regulation—that have restored its economic fortunes. Ben Johnson January 18, 2019 Democratic socialists have presented Denmark as the elusive nation where socialism…

Read More

Sweden Socialist?

By Mike Kapic / January 8, 2019 / Comments Off on Sweden Socialist?

Sweden Isn’t Socialist John Stossel January 1, 2019 Obama Used Walls to Shut Out Veterans, Opposes Walls To Stop Illegal Aliens For years, I’ve heard American leftists say Sweden is proof that socialism works, that it doesn’t have to turn out as badly as the Soviet Union or Cuba or Venezuela did. But that’s not…

Read More

Friedman Schools a Young Bernie

By Mike Kapic / December 15, 2018 / Comments Off on Friedman Schools a Young Bernie

After all these years, Bernie is just as ignorant on economics and freedoms today as he was as a youngster.

Read More

Socialism: The Opiate of the Corrupt and Ignorant

By Mike Kapic / November 25, 2018 / Comments Off on Socialism: The Opiate of the Corrupt and Ignorant

November 16, 2018   |   By Charles W. Calomiris The overarching message of “The Opportunity Cost of Socialism”—a study recently released by the President’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA)—is that the advocacy of socialism cannot reasonably be based on policy preferences; its attraction has always been grounded in a combination of wishful thinking and ignorance. For example, the…

Read More

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: (#4) Application request limit reached
Type: OAuthException
Code: 4
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Categories

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: (#4) Application request limit reached
Type: OAuthException
Code: 4
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

A Cure for Socialism

NATELSON: A FINAL CURE FOR SOCIALISM? UTAH ENDORSES CONVENTION OF STATES

Robert Natelson | Senior Fellow, Independence Institute 03/11/2019

While the media fixate on the socialist impulses Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her allies, a quiet grass-roots revolution is spreading through the country. If successful, it will ensure that demagogues can never impose socialism in America.

The revolution is called the Convention of States movement — and on Tuesday Utah became the 14th state to sign on.  The Utah state legislature passed a formal “application” for what the U.S. Constitution calls a “convention for proposing amendments.”

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Merrill Nelson, said the aim was to fix a “broken” federal government. “The checks and balances in our Constitution have been stretched and broken. All three branches are exercising legislative power. The courts are deciding matters of public policy. The executive is issuing executive orders, making law as we speak. And there’s no way to challenge it.”

Utah’s action is particularly significant because that state had been a stronghold for organizations opposing a convention. Those organizations typically raise money by telling donors the convention could, essentially, stage a coup d’etat — a ridiculous claim with no legal or historical basis.

The Constitution includes restraints on federal power, which, if enforced, would prevent socialists from enacting their agenda. However, those restraints have atrophied in recent years. A primary aim of convention advocates is to restore them.

For example, when read correctly, the Constitution grants Congress only limited spending authority, leaving most social programs to the states. Thus, a proper reading of the Constitution prevents Congress from imposing a single-payer health plan. But rogue Supreme Court decisions have “interpreted” the Constitution to permit Congress to spend without restraint. Those decisions give socialists legal cover for a single-payer system.

Fortunately, constitutional amendments can overrule rogue Supreme Court decisions. Three amendments — the 11th, 14th, and 26th — were adopted partly or entirely for that purpose. Similarly, amendments can protect Americans from other socialist goals, such as the Green New Deal, confiscatory taxation, seizure of businesses and other property, and abolition of air travel.

In addition to using the amendment process to overrule Supreme Court decisions, Americans have employed it to reform government and protect individual liberty. The first 10 amendments created our Bill of Rights. Other amendments abolished slavery (the 13th), protected minorities (the 14th and 15th), ensured women the right to vote (the 19th), and limited the president to two terms (the 22nd).

The Constitution requires all amendments to be ratified by three fourths of the states (38 of 50) — but the Constitution also requires that before they can be ratified, they must be formally proposed. Proposal is either by Congress or by a convention. Reform advocates recognize that Congress will never endorse amendments curbing its own power. But a convention for proposing amendments can, as its name suggests, propose amendments when Congress refuses to do so.

A convention for proposing amendments consists of delegations from the state legislatures. The rule of decision is “one state/one vote.” Its constitutional position is similar to that of the Electoral College — that is, the Constitution grants it only one function, after which it dissolves.

Thirty-four state legislatures would have to approve applications similar to Utah’s to require Congress to call such a gathering.

Applications like Utah’s would permit the convention to propose amendments reversing court rulings that unconstitutionally increase federal power. Under Utah’s application, the convention also could propose measures to tame the federal debt and enact term limits for Congress and for federal officials, including judges. And it could propose amendments to curb federal micro-management of American life. (Do we really need the feds to tell us how many gallons our toilets may flush or what bathrooms kids can use in our schools?)

During the Utah legislative debate, supporters emphasized that the federal government has grown dysfunctional and over-large. They noted that the founders inserted the convention process in the Constitution to allow Americans to respond when such problems arose.

They might have added that the Convention of States movement also provides a way to protect Americans from the threat of socialism.

Rob Natelson is senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver. He was a law professor for 25 years, and became the nation’s most-published active scholar on the Constitution’s amendment process. He serves as an adviser to the Convention of States movement.

The Daily Caller.

Posted in

Mike Kapic